Coping and injury attribution in head-injured adults

Date
1991
DOI
Authors
Solet, Jo M.
Version
OA Version
Citation
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the coping styles, beliefs, and symptoms of head-injured adults during long term recovery. Twenty-eight head-injured and thirty-two control subjects suffering from non-neurological illnesses or injuries participated. Subjects completed the Ways of Coping Questionnaire and two questionnaires developed for this study: the "Why Me?" Questionnaire assessed subjects' causal attributions and beliefs about responsibility and the Head-Injury Symptom List provided self-report of the severity of symptoms of head-injury. The coping and belief profiles of the two groups were compared. Head-injured subjects were more likely to place responsibility for their injury on others and to undertake personal efforts to effect their recovery. Various relations between injury attributions and coping styles were obtained. Among both head-injured and control subjects those who endorsed beliefs of retribution were more likely to cope by wishing they could change their situation. Responses to the Head-Injury Symptom List identified tiredness as the most pervasive symptom. Greater symptomatology was related both to a coping style characterized by lack of ability or willingness to engage in social activity or to seek social support and to beliefs that the injury had occurred to serve a meaningful purpose. Consistent with these quantitative results, interviews with head-injured subjects revealed themes of both loss and enhancement. A majority compared their recovery favorably with that of other individuals. In support of cognitive coping theory, this research demonstrates the feasibility of studying the coping capacities of head-injured individuals and shows that they have distinctive coping styles and beliefs which are related to each other. This knowledge should aid those trying to support the recovery of head-injured individuals by adding to the framework upon which interventions are based.
Description
License
This work is being made available in OpenBU by permission of its author, and is available for research purposes only. All rights are reserved to the author.